Wednesday, 16 January 2019   







You are here: Home Articles
Defending the Honour of Uthmaan Bin Affaan From Al-Hajuri and His Extremist Followers: Part 7
Posted by Abu.Iyaad, Editor in Articles

  Mail To Friend    Printer Friendly Bookmark and Share

The Reliance Upon the Statement of Ibn Umar

The Hajaawirah Haddaadiyyah have fought a great battle to exonerate and defend al-Hajuri in the issue of accusing Uthmaan (radiallaahu anhu) of instituting bid'ah into the religion, and they have a variety of ways in this battle. From these ways is to make use of the statement of Ibn Umar (radiyallaahu anhu) that is reported by Ibn Abee Shaybah in his Musannaf:

الأذان الأول يوم الجمعة بدعة

The first adhaan on the day of Jumu'ah is an innovation.

Thinking that this is rejection from Abdullaah Ibn Umar of the action of Uthmaan (radiyallaahu anhu), whereas in reality - if we accept for argument's sake that it is authentic - it is a statement similar to the father of Abdullah bin Umar which is Umar bin al-Khattaab (نعمة البدعة هذه), "What an excellent innovation this is" in relation to the Taraaweeh prayer in Ramadaan. For the use of the word (bid'ah) here is with its linguisting meaning, not shar'iyy, legislative meaning.

Ibn Taymiyyah said in Minhaj al-Sunnah (6/292)

And what was done by Uthmaan of (adding) the first call of prayer, the people were agreed upon it after him: The people of the four madhhabs and other than them, just as they agreed upon what Umar had also instituted of gathering the people behind a single Imaam in Ramadhaan.

And he also said (21/319):

So whatever the rightly-guided Khulafaa instituted is not a legislatively (defined) innovation that is prohibited against, even if it is described as "innovation" linguistically, due to it having been initiated. Just as Umar said, "What an excellent innovation this is..."

This shows the correct understanding of the saying of Ibn Umar, he is simply describing the adhaan instituted by Uthmaan (radiyallaahu anhu) with the linguistic meaning of bid'ah, meaning it was not present before and is something new.

The same is said by Shaykh Ibn Baaz (here) when he was asked specifically about the adhaan of Uthmaan:

ولهذا أقره الصحابة - يعني عثمان - في زمانه وعمله المسلمون من بعده ... وهكذا ما فعله عمر رضي الله عنه من جمع الناس على إمام واحد في التراويح في رمضان

And for this reason, the Companions accepted [the instituted adhaan) from him - meaning Uthmaan - in his time, and the Muslims acted upon it after him... and likewise what Umar (radiallaahu anhu) did of gathering the people behind a single Imaam in the Taraweeh prayer in Ramadaan.

So the statement of Ibn Umar that the adhaan of Uthmaan (radiyallaahu anhu) was bid'ah is agreed upon by everyone, for it is a bid'ah in the linguistic sense of the word. And had it been a bid'ah in the legislative sense of the word it would mean all the Companions affirmed Uthmaan upon bid'ah and dalaalah and mukhaalafah (opposition) to the Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) - see Shaykh Ibn al-Uthaymeen's speech (here). This is how a person would view the situation in reality. And in any case, if any other Sahabee differed, the matter would return back to the Khulafaa and what they instituted as commanded by the Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam). Ibn Taymiyyah said in al-Majmu' (32/347)

For when others oppose the rightly-guided Khulafaa (in a matter) it is their saying that is superior because the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) said, "You must follow my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the rightly-guided khulafaa after me. Hold fast to it and bite onto it with the molars. And beware of the newly-invented matters, for every innovation is misguidance."

Now a person might ask: What about other scholars who might have held the same view of the second adhaan being in opposition to the Sunnah of the Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam), are they misguided and deviant as well? The answer to that question is that those Scholars who held this view, they are excused because the matter was not taken up with them and exhaustively debated such that their error became apparent to them. Further, unlike al-Hajuri, the Companions were safe from the tongues of those scholars, for we see al-Hajuri having a range of other revilements upon the Sahaabah, such as accusing them of participating in the murder of Uthmaan (radiallaahu anhu), innovating Irjaa', being punished twice for two disobediences (see here) and other such affairs. Thus the persistence of al-Hajuri and his followers in this matter, after the evidence clearly exonerates Uthmaan (radiallaahu anhu), then it is a sign of following desires. As for their use of the positions of certain scholars like Shaykh al-Albaanee, that is not for them, but it is against and that will be covered shortly.

Refer to the article (صد البغي والعدوان عن الخليفة الراشد عثمان) which has been use for this article for further details on this matter.


Link to this article:   Show: HTML LinkFull LinkShort Link
Share or Bookmark this page: You will need to have an account with the selected service in order to post links or bookmark this page.

                 
  
Subscribe via RSS or email:
Follow us through RSS or email. Click the RSS icon to subscribe to our feed.

     

Add a Comment
You must be registered and logged in to comment.





Topics
Books
Articles
Resources

Latest Articles
Ahmad Nishwan Al-Maldivi - Hajurite Haddadi Extremist Turns Hardcore Takfiri Kharijite
The Adhaan of Uthmaan: Bayaan Talbees Al-Hajaawirah
Documentation of Al-Hajuri's Misguided and Erroneous View on the First Adhaan
More Connections Between Haddadi Hajurites and the Extremist Haddadis Such as Abdul-Hameed Al-Juhanee
The Evil Effects of Intoxicating Bid'ah Upon the Mind, Heart and Soul of Bigoted Hajurites
The Hajaawirah, the Extremist Haddaadis and the Terrorist Kharijites of ISIS
An Exposition of the Attempts of the Qutbiyyah, Takfiriyyah, Haddaadiyyah and Hajawirah to Ascribe Irjaa to Shaykh Rabee
Yahya Al-Haddadi: A Revilement Upon Hamza, the Chief of the Martyrs
Warning Against the Extremist Haddadi Hajurite Fanatic and Seeker of Fame: Abu Fujoor Abdul-Fatah Al-Somali Al-Kanadi
Yahya Al-Hajuri Praises the Raafidee Shi'ah Whilst Declaring Shaykhs of Sunnah to Be Enemies

Pages
 Articles on Manhaj.Com
 Books Refuting Yahya al-Hajuri's Deviations

Most Popular
Shaykh Rabee in 1432H: Yahya Al-Hajuri Is a Fool and a Vile Haddadi
Yahya Al-Hajuri Al-Haddadi Receives Abu Al-Hasan Al-Ma'ribi Al-Mumayyi' According to the Latter's Son
Yahya Al-Hajuri Praises the Raafidee Shi'ah Whilst Declaring Shaykhs of Sunnah to Be Enemies
Shaykh Rabee on Khalid Al-Gharbani 'A Lying Distorting Ikhwani Haddaadee Infiltrator' and Yahya Al-Hajuri 'A Haddadi'
Shaykh of the Hajaawirah Yahya Al-Hajuri Rejected in Makkah After Seeking an Audience With Shaykh Rabee
The Hajaawirah, the Extremist Haddaadis and the Terrorist Kharijites of ISIS
Al-Albaani, Ibn Uthaymin and Al-Fawzaan Free Uthmaan From Bid'ah and Dalaalah: A Refutation of Yahya Al-Hajuri, Musa Millington, Abu Fujoor Abd Al-Fattaah Al-Kanadi (And Other Hajurites)
Lessons From the Fall and Sacking of Dammaaj at the Hands of Yahya Al-Hajuri: Shaykh Muhammad Bin Abdul-Wahhaab Al-Wasabee
Some of the Reasons Why I Recanted From the Manhaj of Shaykh Al-Hajuri
Why Is Shaykh Muqbil Excused and Yahya Al-Hajuri Al-Haddadi Is Not? The Answer

Archives (View more)
2014 • December
2014 • October
2014 • August
2014 • May
2014 • April
2014 • March
2014 • February
2013 • October
2013 • September


Key Topics
ahmad nishwanal-hajurihaddaadiyyahirjaaisiskharijitestakfiris
Copyright © 2019 . All rights reserved. RSSTagsPrivacyLegal and Terms of UseSitemap