Thursday, 25 April 2019   







You are here: Home Articles
Shaykh Ibn Uthaymeen: The One Who Says Adhaan of Uthmaan Is Bid'ah Reviles the Messenger, the Caliphs and the Companions
Posted by Abu.Iyaad, Editor in Articles

  Mail To Friend    Printer Friendly Bookmark and Share

Shaykh Ibn Uthaymeen wrote in his Sharh Riyaadh al-Saaliheen, in the chapter on the excellence of the adhaan (Dar al-Salam, 1st edition, 1423H, p. 1278)

And the Jumu'ah (prayer) has a first adhaan which is from the Sunnah of Uthmaan (radiyallaahu anhu), and he is one of the rightly-guided Caliphs whose Sunnah we have been commanded to follow. Some of those pretending to be clever who claim that they are Salafis, Sunnis say: We do not accept the first adhaan of Jumu'ah, it is a bid'ah, it was not present in the time of the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam).

This statement of theirs is a revilement upon the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam), a revilement upon the rightly-guided Caliphs and a revilement upon the Companions. And these paupers reached this limit without knowing. As for it being a revilement upon the Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam), it is because the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) said, "You must follow my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the rightly-guided Caliphs after me." And by consensus of the Muslims, Uthmaan (radiyallaahu anhu) is from the the rightly-guided caliphs. And as for it being a revilement upon the rightly-guided Caliphs, then it is a revilement upon Uthmaan (radiyallaahu anhum) and he is from them. And the one who reviles one of them, he reviles all of them, just like the one who rejects a single Messenger, he is a rejector of all of the Messengers. And as for it being a revilement of the Companions, then it is beacuse the Companions did not show rejection against Uthmaan (radiyallaahu anhu) alongside the fact that if he had erred (in this matter), they would have rejected just as they rejected him completing (the prayer) whilst in Mina during Hajj. However, regarding the first adhaan of Jumu'ah, they did not show rejection against him. So are these opposers who are pretending to be clever more knowledgeable of the Shari'ah and its objectives than the Companions?! However, the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) spoke the truth when he said, "The latter part of this uymmah will curse its first part" and refuge is with Allah, and he reviles them.

So the first adhaan is a legislated adhaan by indication of the Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Sunnah of the chief of the believers Uthmaan (radiyallaahu anhu) and by consensus of the Companions, with an ijmaa' sukootee, and no one has any excuse, may Allaah cut the tongue of the one who criticizes the rightly-guided Caliphs of this ummah and the Companions. Someone might say: Why did the Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) not legislate it whilst the Jumu'ah (prayer) was present in his era?

The answer: That the reason was the people increased in the time of Uthmaan and Madeenah expanded and they were in need of an adhaan to notify them before the later adhaan which is done when the Imaam arrives, so it was from wisdom that such an adhaan (be made). And Uthmaan (radiyallaahu anhu) built this upon the basis that the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) commanded Bilal to make adhaan at the end of the night, not because the (Fajr) prayer had entered but in order to awaken those who were sleep and to alert those praying at night (to end their night-prayer). Hence it is an objective recognized by the legislation and there is no problem in the legislative nature of the first adhaan of Jumu'ah.

Hence, the first adhaan on the day of Jumu'ah is legislated by the Sunnah of the rightly-guided Caliphs and the indication of the Chief of the Messengers (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) and the consensus of the Companions who reached (the time when this adhaan was instituted).


Link to this article:   Show: HTML LinkFull LinkShort Link
Share or Bookmark this page: You will need to have an account with the selected service in order to post links or bookmark this page.

                 
  
Subscribe via RSS or email:
Follow us through RSS or email. Click the RSS icon to subscribe to our feed.

     

Add a Comment
You must be registered and logged in to comment.





Topics
Books
Articles
Resources

Latest Articles
Ahmad Nishwan Al-Maldivi - Hajurite Haddadi Extremist Turns Hardcore Takfiri Kharijite
The Adhaan of Uthmaan: Bayaan Talbees Al-Hajaawirah
Documentation of Al-Hajuri's Misguided and Erroneous View on the First Adhaan
More Connections Between Haddadi Hajurites and the Extremist Haddadis Such as Abdul-Hameed Al-Juhanee
The Evil Effects of Intoxicating Bid'ah Upon the Mind, Heart and Soul of Bigoted Hajurites
The Hajaawirah, the Extremist Haddaadis and the Terrorist Kharijites of ISIS
An Exposition of the Attempts of the Qutbiyyah, Takfiriyyah, Haddaadiyyah and Hajawirah to Ascribe Irjaa to Shaykh Rabee
Yahya Al-Haddadi: A Revilement Upon Hamza, the Chief of the Martyrs
Warning Against the Extremist Haddadi Hajurite Fanatic and Seeker of Fame: Abu Fujoor Abdul-Fatah Al-Somali Al-Kanadi
Yahya Al-Hajuri Praises the Raafidee Shi'ah Whilst Declaring Shaykhs of Sunnah to Be Enemies

Pages
 Articles on Manhaj.Com
 Books Refuting Yahya al-Hajuri's Deviations

Most Popular
Shaykh Rabee in 1432H: Yahya Al-Hajuri Is a Fool and a Vile Haddadi
Yahya Al-Hajuri Praises the Raafidee Shi'ah Whilst Declaring Shaykhs of Sunnah to Be Enemies
Yahya Al-Hajuri Al-Haddadi Receives Abu Al-Hasan Al-Ma'ribi Al-Mumayyi' According to the Latter's Son
Shaykh of the Hajaawirah Yahya Al-Hajuri Rejected in Makkah After Seeking an Audience With Shaykh Rabee
Shaykh Rabee on Khalid Al-Gharbani 'A Lying Distorting Ikhwani Haddaadee Infiltrator' and Yahya Al-Hajuri 'A Haddadi'
The Hajaawirah, the Extremist Haddaadis and the Terrorist Kharijites of ISIS
Al-Albaani, Ibn Uthaymin and Al-Fawzaan Free Uthmaan From Bid'ah and Dalaalah: A Refutation of Yahya Al-Hajuri, Musa Millington, Abu Fujoor Abd Al-Fattaah Al-Kanadi (And Other Hajurites)
Lessons From the Fall and Sacking of Dammaaj at the Hands of Yahya Al-Hajuri: Shaykh Muhammad Bin Abdul-Wahhaab Al-Wasabee
Why Is Shaykh Muqbil Excused and Yahya Al-Hajuri Al-Haddadi Is Not? The Answer
Some of the Reasons Why I Recanted From the Manhaj of Shaykh Al-Hajuri

Archives (View more)
2014 • December
2014 • October
2014 • August
2014 • May
2014 • April
2014 • March
2014 • February
2013 • October
2013 • September


Key Topics
ahmad nishwanal-hajurihaddaadiyyahirjaaisiskharijitestakfiris
Copyright © 2019 . All rights reserved. RSSTagsPrivacyLegal and Terms of UseSitemap